Can I use a CRT to sell farmland while retaining family access to hunt or camp?

Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs) are sophisticated estate planning tools that allow individuals to sell assets, like farmland, receive income for a specified period, and ultimately benefit a charity of their choice. While seemingly counterintuitive, CRTs *can* be structured to allow continued family access to the land for recreational purposes like hunting and camping, though it requires careful planning and specific language within the trust document. This is often achieved by retaining a “non-charitable remainder interest” that grants certain usage rights. The key is balancing the desire for income, charitable giving, and continued family traditions, all while complying with complex IRS regulations.

What are the tax benefits of using a CRT for farmland?

Selling farmland directly can trigger significant capital gains taxes, potentially reaching rates of up to 20% plus the 3.8% net investment income tax. However, transferring the farmland to a CRT allows the seller to defer those capital gains taxes, potentially reinvesting the proceeds into income-producing assets. Furthermore, the seller receives an immediate income tax deduction for the present value of the remainder interest ultimately passing to the charity – this deduction can be substantial, potentially offsetting a significant portion of their income tax liability. According to a recent study by the National Philanthropic Trust, donors who utilize CRTs often see a 20-30% reduction in their overall tax burden. This makes CRTs particularly attractive for landowners facing a large tax liability on the sale of appreciated assets like farmland.

How do I structure a CRT to allow family access?

Creating a CRT that permits continued family access requires meticulous drafting. The trust document must specifically grant the family a limited right to use the land for hunting, camping, or other agreed-upon activities. This right is *not* a traditional remainder interest, as it does not pass to the charity. Instead, it’s a retained non-charitable interest, akin to a private easement. “We often call these ‘personal residence trusts’ or ‘recreational trusts’ within a CRT framework,” explains Ted Cook, an Estate Planning Attorney in San Diego. “It’s crucial to clearly define the scope of permitted use – the number of days, the areas of the land accessible, and any restrictions on activities – to avoid conflicts with the charitable beneficiary or the IRS.” The language must be precise, limiting the use to specific family members and detailing any responsibilities for land maintenance or insurance.

What happened when a family didn’t properly plan their CRT?

Old Man Tiberius had farmed his land for 70 years and wanted to ensure his grandchildren could continue hunting on it after he was gone. He sold the land to a CRT, intending for the charity to receive the remainder after a 20-year income stream for his family. However, the trust document was vaguely worded, simply stating the family could “continue enjoying recreational access.” Shortly after the trust was funded, the charitable beneficiary, a national wildlife conservation organization, began leasing hunting rights to the public to maximize revenue. The Tiberius grandchildren were furious, finding strangers on “their” land. A costly legal battle ensued, ultimately resulting in the court siding with the charity, as the trust document didn’t clearly define or limit the family’s access. This situation highlights the critical importance of precise language and thorough planning when establishing a CRT with retained usage rights. It also shows that vague intent is meaningless without proper legal backing.

How did a family successfully use a CRT to preserve their legacy?

The Hawthorne family had owned a sprawling cattle ranch for generations. They wanted to provide for their children, minimize estate taxes, and ensure future generations could continue enjoying the ranch’s scenic beauty and hunting opportunities. They worked with Ted Cook to establish a CRT, transferring ownership of the ranch to the trust. The trust document *specifically* granted the Hawthorne grandchildren and their descendants the exclusive right to hunt and camp on a designated portion of the ranch for up to 30 days each year. The rest of the land was leased to a conservation organization, providing consistent income for the family during their lifetime. After the designated period, the remainder would pass to the conservation organization, furthering the family’s commitment to environmental stewardship. This arrangement not only protected the family’s legacy but also provided significant tax benefits and a sustainable income stream. It demonstrated how, with careful planning, a CRT can be a powerful tool for preserving both financial assets and cherished family traditions.


Who Is Ted Cook at Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.:

Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

2305 Historic Decatur Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA. 92106

(619) 550-7437

Map To Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC, a wills and trust attorney: https://maps.app.goo.gl/JiHkjNg9VFGA44tf9


trust litigation attorneyt wills and trust lawyer intestate succession California
trust litigation attorney will in California California will requirements
trust litigation attorney trust litigation attorney will attorney near me

About Point Loma Estate Planning:



Secure Your Legacy, Safeguard Your Loved Ones. Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

Feeling overwhelmed by estate planning? You’re not alone. With 27 years of proven experience – crafting over 25,000 personalized plans and trusts – we transform complexity into clarity.

Our Areas of Focus:

Legacy Protection: (minimizing taxes, maximizing asset preservation).

Crafting Living Trusts: (administration and litigation).

Elder Care & Tax Strategy: Avoid family discord and costly errors.

Discover peace of mind with our compassionate guidance.

Claim your exclusive 30-minute consultation today!


If you have any questions about: Can an trust litigation attorney protect assets from family disputes?

OR

How can an MPOA protect against unwanted medical interventions?

and or:
How can estate administration protect beneficiaries from legal disputes?

Oh and please consider:

What are some common mistakes to avoid when choosing an executor or trustee?
Please Call or visit the address above. Thank you.